|
Design Considerations
Fostering Social Capital with a Mass Timber Data Center
Building with MT fosters social capital by strengthening community ties and supporting local economies. Sourcing timber from nearby forests and engaging local suppliers create jobs and stimulate regional economies, particularly in rural areas where forestry and timber industries are vital. This connection to the local supply chain builds a sense of shared purpose and pride, as communities see tangible benefits from the sustainable use of their natural resources. Additionally, MT’s aesthetic qualities—such as warm, natural finishes—can create inviting, people-centered spaces that foster collaboration, creativity, well-being, and a sense of belonging, all of which are vital for building social capital. Furthermore, MT projects often emphasize sustainable practices and environmental stewardship, reinforcing the values of community care and long-term responsibility, which further strengthen social bonds.
​
Projects like Microsoft’s Virginia MT data centers exemplify this alignment. They resonate with local sustainability values and reinforce corporate responsibility commitments among big tech clients, enhancing social bonds and public perception.
​
Moreover, MT’s integration with prefabricated systems underscores environmental stewardship, further enhancing social capital by showcasing a commitment to long-term community care—a value increasingly demanded by stakeholders.
​
Off-site fabrication dramatically reduces on-site disruption, minimizing noise and traffic impacts in urban or rural communities, as seen in projects like the McKinstry Catalyst Building in Spokane, WA.
​
This prefabricated, offsite approach not only supports local economies by locally sourcing wood fiber (including FSC-certified wood) but also aligns with sustainability pledges (such as Google’s net-zero goals), enhancing community goodwill and developer reputation.
​
By prioritizing sustainable sourcing and efficient construction, MT data centers position developers as community partners, building trust and support through a model that benefits people and the environment alike.
The Prefabricated, Hybrid Mass Timber Data Center isn’t Completely without Precedent
“If MT is so great, why isn’t anybody else building one?”
“Actually, they are. Including some of the biggest players in the data center industry.”
​
MT in hyperscale data centers has historically been viewed as improbable due to traditional industry reliance on steel and concrete for perceived strength and familiarity. Concerns over fire codes, heat loads, and moisture management often dismiss MT before serious consideration—an outdated mindset given recent advancements. However, pilot projects have begun to shift this perception.
​
Microsoft’s carbon reduction using CLT in Virginia data centers and other emerging hyperscale designs integrating MT with off-site prefabricated MEP systems and volumetric assemblies (sustainable HAC – or Hot Aisle Containment – solutions) demonstrate its viability in mission-critical settings.
​
Yet, the scarcity of widespread precedent persists, with fears of delamination or structural failure under extreme conditions lingering among conservative stakeholders, necessitating robust testing and risk mitigation strategies.
​
The landscape is evolving rapidly as research and adoption grow. In fact, the U.S. Forest Service reports over 1,500 MT buildings completed or in design by 2022 across sectors, while Department of Defense studies validate MT’s resilience for fire and blast scenarios, proving its potential for data centers (U.S. Forest Service, "MT Market Updates," 2022).
​
Industry forecasts suggest a full-scale MT hyperscale data center will break ground within three years, driven by sustainability mandates and prefab fusions, integrating modular cooling units off-site to address heat concerns and shifting MT from experimental to standard.
​
For developers, this transition requires early collaboration with experienced teams to navigate unknowns, leveraging digital twins to simulate performance under AI-driven workloads, and ensuring compliance with seismic and fire codes (IBC 2021). Thus, mitigating risks and building confidence in this reimagined construction model (McKinsey Data Center Report, 2023).
A Gallery of Mass Timber-Steel Hybrid Construction Examples
Designing the Prefabricated Mass Timber Data Center
While the advantages are considerable, the sizable savings in build time and cost you achieve from MT do not solely reside in a surrogate material. It’s about parlaying it with a broad deployment of other prefabricated solutions.
​
MT in data center design transcends the simplistic notion of replacing steel and concrete with wood; it catalyzes reimagining engineering and performance through precision-engineered, prefabricated solutions. While MT offers strengths like carbon efficiency, its inherent properties—smaller spans, greater deflection, and deeper structural depths—pose challenges, increasing floor-to-floor heights and complicating hyperscale layouts with height/area limits. However, the true potential lies in integrating off-site fabricated MEP systems to optimize performance.
​
Hybrid MT-steel designs, such as Microsoft’s steel frame with CLT decks, balance heavy loads (server racks, battery storage, and UPS systems) and sustainability. These hybrids are capable of satisfying a broad range of code-driven structural requirements by using advanced tools like BIM (Building Information Modeling) and digital twins, which pre-coordinate MT panels with MEP pathways, ensuring seismic stability, airflow, and vibration isolation for sensitive electronics. Precision engineering off-site—down to millimeter accuracy—eliminates on-site adjustments, reducing rework and ensuring reliability in high-density IT spaces.
​
However, hybrid MT designs come with significant potential challenges that can derail projects if not addressed with expertise:
​
-
Improper load distribution between MT and steel components risks over-reliance on one material, leading to structural inefficiencies,
-
Underestimating deflection in MT spans can cascade into MEP integration failures.
-
The mismatched thermal expansion between timber and steel can cause joint failures if not pre-designed with expansion tolerances; we’ve seen projects where connections cracked mid-construction due to this oversight.
-
Inadequate fire detailing at MT-steel interfaces, often underestimated, can fail stringent codes like NFPA or FM Global, especially in data centers where uptime is paramount.
-
Finally, sequencing or fabrication errors on glulam members can halt progress, as field corrections are far more time-consuming and capital-intensive than those for steel.
These potential challenges underscore the stakes: simple missteps can inflate costs or delay schedules, undermining the ROI that justified adopting a hybrid MT design.
What Does an Efficient, Hybrid Design Look Like?
The sections below provide a high-level summary of the potential deployment strategies for a Mass Timber Data Center. They encompass the “Low Hanging Fruit” (Tiers 1 & 2) and a thought exercise for what lies beyond: the theoretical “Full Timber Data Center.”
Baseline: Concrete & Steel
Tier 1: Walls
Description: Mass Timber panels for perimeter wall construction.
Justification: This is the simplest adoption. It allows for the installation of large sections of wall, alleviating the 5-7 days of forming and cure (concrete tilt-up) and leaving a slab perimeter that must be filled in later.
Degree of Difficulty: Low. Mass Timber wall panels require a rain screen, but there are prefabricated systems to increase the speed of construction.
Lift to Next Tier: ​Low. No effect on horizontal framing systems.
Schedule Impact: Low.
Tier 2: Roof
Description: CLT panels for roof structure only.
Justification: Simple adoption—minimal live loads, leverages MT’s large format and prefab speed for quick assembly atop existing frameworks.
Degree of Difficulty: Low. Lowest redesign; aligns with standard codes (IBC 2021).
Lift to Next Tier (3): ​Minimal—adds floor loading analysis, slight design adjustment needed.
Schedule Impact: Medium.
Tier 3: Steel Structure with CLT Floor Decking
Description: Steel columns/beams, CLT floors.
Justification: This solution Balances Mass Timber’s carbon efficiency with steel’s load capacity, which has been proven in existing projects. It also enhances prefab assembly speed.
Degree of Difficulty: Moderate: Adjusts floor design for MT spans (20-30 ft), requires steel-MT fire detailing.
Lift to Next Tier: ​Moderate. Adds MT purlins, increases timber reliance.
Schedule Impact: High.
Tier 4: Steel Primary, Glulam Secondary, CLT Decking
Description: Steel columns/primary beams, Glulam purlins, CLT floors.
Justification: Expands MT use with Glulam’s strength (e.g., 24-inch deep members) for secondary support, integrating prefab benefits and aesthetics.
Degree of Difficulty: Medium: Needs load transfer analysis and hybrid connections (e.g., bolts).
Lift to Next Tier: ​Significant. Shifts primary beams to MT, escalates complexity.
Schedule Impact: Low.
Tier 5: Steel Columns, Glulam Primary/Secondary Beams, CLT Decking
Description: Steel columns, Glulam beams (primary & secondary), CLT floors; includes Glulam brace frames, CLT façade/shear walls, and hybrid beams (e.g., Peikko Delta Beam).
Justification: This maximizes MT’s structural role, reducing steel use with prefab precision (e.g., bolted Glulam); brace frames/shear walls add stability and hybrid beams address depth limits.
Degree of Difficulty: High. Advanced engineering for MT load-bearing due to high long-term loads and less complex fire/seismic detailing.
Lift to Next Tier (6): ​Substantial. Full MT structure demands innovation.
Schedule Impact: N/A
Tier 6: Full Glulam Structure, CLT Decking
Description: All-Glulam columns/beams, CLT floors; includes CLT elevator shafts/stairwells.
Justification: Future evolution maximizing sustainability (e.g., biogenic carbon) and prefab efficiency.
Degree of Difficulty: Very High: Requires significant design innovation, new product development, and code advancements (e.g., IBC tall timber limits; NFPA Guidelines, possible composite concrete/timber composite).
Lift to Next Tier: ​N/A
Schedule Impact: Low
Tier X: Possible to Introduce at Multiple Tiers
Description: MT Hot Aisle Containment (HAC) walls, Structurally Engineered Bamboo (SEB) server racks.
Justification: MT HAC walls support modular cooling for AI loads while drastically reducing installation/assembly time. SEB server racks (beta samples exist in partnership with Vertiv and Renuteq).
Degree of Difficulty: Varies. Each deployment may fit within an above tier but influences the design for floor vs. ceiling-mounted HAC assemblies (altering entire floor loading and seismic evaluations).
Lift to Next Tier: ​N/A
Schedule Impact: N/A